亚马逊

北京养犬年检工作5月1日启动，今年手机上可办理_我的网站

一 |     北京晚报讯（记者张蕾）北京市养犬年检工作将于5月1日正式启动。    In a verdict that brings to a close one of the most closely followed criminal trials in Kerala’s recent history, the Principal District and Sessions Court in Ernakulam on Monday acquitted Malayalam actor Dileep in the 2017 case concerning the abduction and sexual assault of a prominent woman actor. The court, presided over by Judge Honey M Varghese, found that the prosecution had failed to substantiate the allegations against Dileep, who was listed as the eighth accused, and against Charlie Thomas, the seventh accused.However, the court convicted six others, including the prime accused Sunil N S, better known as Pulsar Suni, finding them guilty of multiple serious charges including conspiracy, kidnapping, and gang rape. Sentences for the convicted individuals will be pronounced on December 12.     In This Article      Court Finds Key Accused Guilty of Multiple ChargesA Case That Shook Kerala’s Film IndustryDileep’s Arrest, Trial, and AcquittalWhat Lies AheadCourt Finds Key Accused Guilty of Multiple Charges     The six men convicted in the case are Sunil N S alias Pulsar Suni, Martin Antony, Manikandan B, Vijeesh V P, Salim H alias Vadival Salim, and Pradeep. They were found guilty under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120B (criminal conspiracy), 340 (wrongful confinement), 354 (use of criminal force to outrage modesty), 366 (kidnapping), 354B (use of force to disrobe a woman), and 376D (gang rape).The court also found them guilty under relevant sections of the Information Technology Act for filming the sexual assault, an act that added a layer of digital evidence to a case already fraught with emotional and social repercussions.The Sessions Court noted that the evidence presented clearly established the involvement of the first six accused in the crime, while the same could not be said for Dileep and Charlie Thomas. The judge stated that the prosecution was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Dileep had played any role in planning or abetting the crime.          A Case That Shook Kerala’s Film Industry     The incident dates back to February 17, 2017, when the survivor, a well-known Malayalam actor, was abducted while travelling to a film shoot in Thrissur. She was allegedly confined inside a moving vehicle and subjected to sexual assault, with the ordeal recorded by the perpetrators on camera.The case sent shockwaves through Kerala and the wider film industry, not only for the nature of the crime but also for the stature of the accused and the victim. The survivor’s courage in pursuing justice inspired widespread conversations about safety, gender dynamics, and accountability in the entertainment world.The first major breakthrough came the day after the incident, when the police arrested Martin Antony, the driver of the vehicle. Within a week, the alleged mastermind Pulsar Suni was also taken into custody. By the end of that month, four more individuals had been arrested, marking a swift initial phase of the investigation.Suni, the first accused, remained in custody for over seven years before being granted bail by the Supreme Court in 2024. Throughout this period, he consistently maintained that he had acted on someone else’s instructions, though his claims remained mired in contradictions and speculation.          Dileep’s Arrest, Trial, and Acquittal     Dileep’s arrest in July 2017 marked a dramatic turning point in the case. The actor was accused of conspiring to orchestrate the crime as an act of revenge following personal disputes involving his then-wife. His arrest divided public opinion in Kerala, leading to polarised debates and protests across the state.The actor’s first two bail pleas were rejected by the Kerala High Court, citing the gravity of the charges and the need for a thorough investigation. He was eventually granted bail in October 2017 after spending 83 days in judicial custody.The trial officially commenced in 2020 and continued for nearly five years. During the proceedings, more than 200 witnesses were examined, and hundreds of documents were submitted as evidence. Despite the extensive nature of the trial, the court ultimately ruled that the prosecution’s case against Dileep lacked sufficient evidence for conviction.For Dileep, who remains one of Malayalam cinema’s biggest stars, the verdict marks the end of a prolonged legal and public ordeal. The actor had consistently maintained his innocence, claiming he had been falsely implicated.     What Lies Ahead     While the judgment has acquitted Dileep, it does not necessarily bring the legal proceedings to a full stop. The survivor retains the right to appeal the verdict before the Kerala High Court, which could reopen judicial scrutiny into the alleged conspiracy.The case remains a defining chapter in Kerala’s cultural and judicial narrative, one that tested the state’s legal system and its society’s response to crimes against women. As the dust settles, the conversation around justice, gender, and accountability in Malayalam cinema is far from over.Also Read: Dileep’s ‘Prince And Family’ Cleared For Release With A U Certificate。根据《北京市公安局关于办理2024年度养犬年检手续的通告》，今年养犬年检时间为5月1日至12月31日。记者从北京市公安局治安管理总队获悉，今年正式推出手机端网上业务，即日起养犬人足不出户通过手机便可为爱犬办理养犬年检及初次养犬登记手续。　　养犬人可通过“平安北京”微信公众号进入“北京警务——网上北京市公安局——养犬管理”界面，或通过“首都治安微提示”微信公众号进入“养犬管理”界面，用手机号登录系统，验证通过后即可进行相关业务办理，并可在线支付管理服务费。

二 | 北京警方在核实犬只符合养犬标准、证件正确无误后，即会为犬只办理相应手续，并形成电子犬证。用户可在“我的业务”栏目“我的犬只”中进行查看。

三 | 　　为了进一步方便市民，北京警方还将联合畜牧兽医部门在部分社区设立“一站式服务”站点，提供养犬登记、年检和狂犬病预防免疫一站式服务，为群众创造便利、节省时间。　　养犬人在手机上办理完犬只登记、年检手续后，可携犬到区兽医行政主管部门认定的狂犬病免疫点对犬只免费接种狂犬病疫苗，领取狂犬病免疫证明和免疫标识。　　北京警方请广大市民积极配合并遵守相关规定，携犬外出要拴犬链，注意避让老年人、残疾人、孕妇和儿童；及时清理犬只粪便，维护公共卫生；及时制止犬只吠叫，不干扰他人正常生活；不随意遗弃犬只。对爱犬负责，对自己负责，对社会负责，用实际行动为爱犬赢得理解和尊重，创造人与犬和谐共存的生活环境。　　《北京市养犬管理规定》相关罚则　　■第二十七条：对未经登记、年检养犬的，由公安机关没收其犬，或者对单位处5000元罚款，对个人处2000元罚款。　　■第二十八条：对逾期不办理养犬变更登记的，由公安机关责令限期改正，并可对单位处2000元罚款，对个人处500元罚款。

Current article:http://www.liawucunsainantaonao.sbs/749vn04/20260826/13461.doc

Published on:18:44:18